Header1.GIF (6758 bytes)

 

luc.gif (377 bytes)

About Us:
- Ownership
- Our Staff
- Facilities

Programs:
- Clinical
- Training

.Resident Evaluation at CMHC, Inc. is Designed to; a) ensure quality training, b) motivate residents to study and learn, c) protect the public

CMHC, Inc.
Resident Evaluation

 

 

Seeking Treatment:

Newsletter:

Coming Events:

Employment Opportunities:

Managed Care:
- Volume Discount Contracting

How Residents are evaluated at CMHC, Inc.

 

Introduction:  Residents are considered high level students who have mastered fundamental course work, basic diagnostic and treatment planning skills, and basic psychotherapy skills (individual, group, family, crisis intervention).  In the internship psychologists learn how to practice in a healthcare job setting.  Therefore, residents are expected to have the skills to integrate themselves into a treatment delivery system, understand and perform a role within that system, to assimilate a facility treatment and organizational philosophy, and to maintain a high level of accountability within the system.  Good training foundations, good intern experience, and good job skills honed in the internship ready the resident for study of clinical leadership skills at an advanced level.

 

Text Box:        Interns and Supervisor (Dr. Hagy)

 

The CMHC, Inc. resident is expected to become a clinical leader.  They are placed in leadership roles as team leader, advanced diagnostician and diagnostic supervisor, psychotherapy supervisor, and program manager early in the residency.  The advanced psychologist must be able to order diagnostic studies to facilitate a differential diagnosis or correct misdiagnosis, to lead multidisciplinary teams to assure that patients and their families are getting appropriate treatment for their diagnosis, to formulate advanced treatment plans, to guide crisis interventions and break down resistance to psychotherapy and systems interventions, and to fit in with programmatic, organizational, and administrative philosophies and guidelines.  The goal is to become a psychology leader capable of acting as a quality assurance force within a healthcare structure using psychological principles.  These skills are superimposed upon learning to address the unique clinical and cultural needs of a rural population across outpatient, day treatment, and inpatient and patient population targeted programs.

 

Evaluation Instruments: 

 

  1. The clinical notebook is a vehicle which chronicles the residents assimilation of state laws related to practice, ethical studies, topical presentation performed by the resident, supervisor’s assignments, supervision and supervision of supervision, and didactic training while at CMHC, Inc.  The clinical notebook will be reviewed quarterly by the primary supervisor and at the end of the training by the Training Director.  The notebook is graded on a Pass/Fail bases.  A failure grade results in remedial work on the topic and the documentation in question in the notebook.
  2. Supervisor Rating Forms are used at CMHC, Inc.  On a quarterly basis, each resident will get a copy of a rating form that evaluates the resident on a Likert Scale that is converted to a point system.  All supervisors and the Training Director rate students.  The scale covers ratings of basic diagnostic, clinical, leadership, and organizational skills.  Supervisor ratings are supplied to the student and to faculty and are used to develop a supervision approach for the next quarter.
  3. Individual Supervision Forms.  Each week the resident will have two individual hours of supervision with a primary and secondary supervisor.  At each supervision session, a Supervision Form is completed which annotates the demographic data and includes a short evaluation of the student’s progress.
  4. Didactic participation is evaluated with a posttest and presenters rating at the end of each didactic.
  5. Didactic presentations are a leadership required of each resident.  One or more presentations may be required to evaluate a residents abilities, performance, and growth as a teaching leader in a health facility.
  6. Performance in each rotation is evaluated on the Rotation Form and is rated as “Inadequate, Adequate, Superior, or Excellent”.
  7. The Training Director and Primary Supervisor evaluate the graduate project.  A student’s work on this project is rated as “Inadequate, Adequate, Superior, or Excellent”.   Students with Inadequate Ratings must address deficiencies in their project before they may graduate with a certificate of completion.  Students with an adequate rating may graduate or upgrade the quality of their effort in order to positively affect later recommendations.
  8. Final Faculty Evaluation:  At the end of the residency, the Training Director and Primary Supervisor will file a written summary and rating of the resident with the faculty.  Any faculty member may file an addendum or independent evaluation of the student’s performance during the residency.  These evaluations will be shown to the student and the evaluations and any student comments submitted will be maintained in the student’s permanent record and are used to respond to references.

 

Graduation Requirements:  To graduate with a certificate of completion from the CMHC, Inc. post doctoral residency in rural clinical psychology the resident must achieve a rating of at least adequate in all rotations, assignments, and functions.  Certain deficiencies may  be cleared up by repeating a rotation or assignment. 

 

 

 

 

(BACK TO PROGRAMS)

 

 

 

footer.gif (1308 bytes)